Prioritise issues by expected impact
Improved
From a public review by Yusuke Matsuba (LandingBoost, https://x.com/yusukelp), posted here on his behalf — he did not file it himself.
In his words:
"Some of the recommendations can still feel a little technical, especially for non-technical founders. It would be even better if the issues were prioritized more clearly by expected impact, so users immediately know which fixes will make the biggest difference."
Two things in one: rank findings by expected impact so the biggest win is obvious at a glance, and soften the wording for founders who aren't developers.
Requested by the community, 2 votes.
